Archive for October, 2008

Reality Star Defends Farmers

Ever thought of your cattle or sheep as ‘Free Range”?
Here is an example of how not all farmers fit the perception of them as ‘red-neck’, ‘I need to bugger the environment to feed you city slickers’, cranks.

David Graham may be best known for his roles in Big Brother and Dancing with the stars, but his core livelihood is sheep meat farming.
He says that,
”Free range lamb is a natural product – unlike fed-lock lambs, which are kept in a small yard and fed continuously.

Mr Graham and his ‘paddock to plate’ group believe that Dorpers are a breed of lamb to watch: the kangaroo of the meat industry that Ross Garnaut is talking about in terms of lower emissions.

”Australia has to get smarter breeds on the land and this is one solution,” said general manager Peter Athey.

They also found that cutting out the middle man and selling direct worked best from a financial perspective. The auction markets gave their farmers only $26 a lamb while the supermarkets valued the same animal at $300. ( Ed’s note: Perhaps this is more an indictment on the existing sales systems than anything!)
Read More of ,The Age article here….

Do you think the main take-out from this article is that;
1. A new sales system is needed to give producers better value?
2. Farmers can make money and control their own destiny?
3. Farmers can afford to actively respect the environment and their stock?
4. Something else?

What do you think?
Please leave a comment below

Leave a Comment

Australia’s Farmers Pawns In Fairfax’s Rural Press Game?

What is it with Fairfax’s FairRural Press publishing a similar base of information across its stable of publications? i.e. Stock & Land, The Land, Queensland Country Life, North Queensland Register, S.A. Stock Journal etc all have a similar base of ‘news’ but forests of paper are used in duplicating it.
For example, the story, “Reserve to cut rates by 5pc to stave off depression”, appears the same in;
QCL
NQR
The Land
Stock Journal
Stock & Land

And the reason for this duplication?
Fairfax can ‘customise’ a small amount of each publication for each state and then justify charging advertisers to go in multiple publications to ‘reach’ Australia’s farmers.  Not a bad strategy but one would think it has questionable morality. Both to the advertisers and the readers who think they are getting a product that is special to their region. And this has been transferred to the Web when users should be able to go to one website instead of trawling around several.

Even if they don’t want to save their readers time and effort, Fairfax may soon be asked to save CO2 emissions and stop such wasteful duplication. (Perhaps if they help to reduce CO2 emissions then we won’t have coal mines trying to boot our farmers off valuable farm land for the World’s food!)

What do you think?
Please leave your comment below

Leave a Comment