The 3 experts who have addressed this issue missed by Prof Garnaut are, Geoff Russell (a mathematician and computer programmer), Peter Singer (Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne) & Barry Brook (Sir Hubert Wilkins Professor of Climate Change at the University of Adelaide).
They conclude by stating,
“Just stop breeding so many sheep and cattle in Australia. And because methane is such a huge contributor to climate change, this is not just an “earth hour” stunt. This is the real deal”.
See the complete Age story here
If the real climate change culprit *is* methane gas from cows and sheep, how can they be exempt from carbon taxing or carbon trading?
When the second-largest current climate change contributor is coal and it gets mentioned 272 times in the Garnaut report and methane from cows and sheep only get mentioned once in the appendices, don’t just think, “We’re safe because we’re special”. Because in a World obsessed with carbon poisoning, no-one is considered special and there are a lot of very influential people out there working on these issues who won’t think you’re special either. If you don’t address it before someone else does it could be to your detriment.
This information is almost certain to get the shock-horror 60 minutes and A Current Affairs shows ranting and they might have a point.
However, I suggest that the World’s farmers work damned hard at ensuring their vegetation can be carbon valued and carbon traded in order to offset the methane production imbalance. If Holden and Coal miners are going to be able to buy carbon credits from forestry plantations then why shouldn’t farmers receive credits from their investment over a couple of hundred years in Australia’s vegetation on their tax-paying farms?!
What do you think
Please leave your comment below