Archive for June, 2008

Government Ignores Murray Water Crisis October Deadline

If you thought all would be OK in the water stakes with a new federal Government, think again! The past mob might have been totally useless but this crowd still has to prove they are different. Ignoring this deadline doesn’t seem like they care .

Scientists say the lower Murray that includes the Coorong, may be now ruined for good. Vegetation has disappeared, some fish species may be gone and salinity is king. Apparently things could be better if the Government deemed increased flows.

See the story here

If these flows must come from the higher reaches and affect other farming areas, would you agree to it or let the South Australian end die its imminent painful death.

Please leave your comment below

Comments (1)

NLIS – Costly And Flawed In Theory And Practice?

This view pretty well sums-up the perception of NLIS from many producers who believe they are funding a scheme flawed in theory and practice.

The National Livestock Identification Scheme more resembles a gauze jug than the failed Quarantine and Inspection Service and should immediately be abandoned in favour of the tail tag system.

Early 2004 I examined the Impact Statement and explained to Michael Beer, N.S.W. D.P.I. how and why it was completely undeliverable. For four years I have been providing details of this fiasco to State and Federal Polititions and their bureauracies. They too, seem to be unable and unwilling to comprehend the Scheme is simply nonsense based on fantasy, and will work wonderfully well so long as there is nothing like Equine Influenza.

Michael Beer recently reported in “The Land” that the subsidy to purchase scanners would discontinue, 794 producers had taken advantage of the offer. There are well over 70,000 Property Identification Codes in N.S.W. Before the Federal election, former Minister McGauran promised $15 million to fix N.L.I.S. which according to some “trumped up” exercise was almost perfect. When Labor won the election this money evaporated and nil allocation in latest budget. Hardly Government support, while producers are being slugged hundreds of million of dollars in compliance costs and wasted levy money.

I appreciate Tony Burke has more pressing problems than a Scheme with no purpose and no tangible results but hope he soon gets around to a serious inquiry into this fraud.

The database is a shambles and the credibility of M.L.A. is in tatters.

I am not so kind as my great little mate the Ooomanakker bird, who recently broke down and wept, then prayed; “Father forgive them for they know not what they do”.

- John Niven (Producer) Bimbi

Do you agree?
Please leave your comment below

Leave a Comment

MLA Says Increased Retail Prices Good For Producers

While retailers and processors have been benefiting from increased meat prices producers haven’t seen a corresponding benefit.
In an ABC interview the MLA’s Don Heatley said that the MLA’s tax levy of $5 per head equates to a fee similar to what producers pay at saleyards and it represents terrific marketing value to producers. He explained that this is illustrated by recent retail prices not resulting in a corresponding fall-off in consumer demand. He didn’t explain how producers benefit from this scenario; though it seems to obviously be good for processors and retailers.
Is there an argument that the MLA has increased it support for its member processors at the cost of its producer members?

Excerpt of ABC interview with MLA’s Chairman Don Heatley Listen here

Does the MLA have a conflict of interest in representing both producer vendors and buyer processors?
Who do you think is currently best served by MLA?

Please leave your comment below

Comments (1)

If NVD’s Are Fatally Flawed (Stock & Land May 29) What about LPA?!

If as Murray Arnel at Stock and Land (Fairfax) (May29) reports, NVD’s are not being completed up to 50% of the time then where does that place the LPA program that relies upon NVD’s?

It’s not news that NVD boxes aren’t being ticked and animal breeds aren’t being completed. While NVD’s have become the default transactional document they are by no means mandatory to transact livestock.

And now it seems the claims made by processors and their membership body, MLA, that NVD’s must be completed, is not absolute and agents are working with processors to attempt to get their client vendors to rectify the situation. This then raises another question about whether agents should be working for their client vendors or the processor buyers – who is paying whom for what services here?!

There’s no doubt NVD’s have served a productive purpose over the years. Is it just since MLA and the processors have interferred with the free market that they are buggering up?
What do you think?

Please leave your comment below to share with others.

Leave a Comment

Do surveys show enough respect for Australia’s farmers?

Rabobank’s latest quarterly survey apparently found that rising input costs and inconsistent rainfall has caused a drop in Australian farmer confidence. Gee, I wouldn’t have thought you would need to be Einstein or run an expensive survey to work that one out!

The survey, apparently questioned around 1200 farmers, found that 38 per cent of farmers expected the agricultural economy to improve over the next twelve months, down from 52 per cent last quarter. Despite the drop, the number of farmers who believe the situation will improve was still above the amount who believe it will deteriorate, which was at 22 per cent, up from 15 per cent in the last survey….And apparently Rabobank’s general manager of Rural Australia Peter Knoblanche said, “without significant winter rain, growers may be prevented from taking advantage of good commodity prices”. (businessspectator.com.au)

This type of meaningless drivel could be of use in a shares stock market that operates to a certain extent on emotion and herd mentality. However, in regard to Australian farming and farmers, it makes me think 3 things;.

1. Whoever is spruiking this type of media release (in this case, Rabobank) is simply looking for a ‘respectable’ excuse to market their brand and gain some additional marketplace credibility from it.
2. Banks have way too much money to be able to waste it this way and perhaps should look at decreasing their rates by cutting their marketing spend.
3. Australia’s farmers are in a valuable market niche segment that deserves more respect from so many brands and marketers, whether local or city-based.

What are some surveys you would like to see performed?  Who agrees with mandatory standardised meat quality assessments? Succession planning? Whether the weather is going to be all rosy at your place within 3 months? Whether your representative farmer groups are representing you well enough? What methods you might be able to use to decrease input costs?
Let us and your mates know via the ‘Comments’ link below.

Leave a Comment